Fuseki.net

Is speaking in tongues more difficult for people whose languages have higher occupancy of words within their space of phonemes?

or rather, are they actually paying for the work of intentionally avoiding continuations which exist within the language?

Are smarter people able to produce more varied patterns of avoidance? or is that even good?

Does glossolalia have a quality level? like, good "English" speaking in tongues is where you sound very much like english but just so happen to never make a word, while bad would be that you both sometimes do slip up and say a "real word" but also that your avoidance patterns are really bad, e.g. by using not-even-english sounds, or maybe that you would produce at max one valid continuation within a non-word, or worse yet, not-even-human animal sounds, sound expressions, gasps and moans

I am not really sure which is worse:

It seems bad to say something like "dictdionORY" and avoid a real word only at the last minute But it also seems bad to break continuation rules too early or too grossly right away as soon as each syllable is out; the person is insisting too much to break

Do some people break more subtle versions of continuation rules, like they break the normal within-word vowel patterns as part of the work of "sounding" like you are speaking a foreign language within english space? But remember that glossolaliasts don't admit that there is a difference between source-language glossolalia, right?

What does mandarin-native glossolalia sound like? This could be a good way to make some of these questions have very obvious answers - by getting reports and evals from non-speakers on whether mandarin tongues sounds mostly like just normal mandarin to them or not?

These thoughts spawned by an episode of "Vocal Fry", a wonderful weekly show exploring the strange audio recordings left behind by all kinds of interesting people over the years, from WFMU the best radio station. https://wfmu.org/playlists/shows/166663

Also featured here, "skip the middleman" and go directly from hypothesis to a generated image of the supposed study program?

Articulatory Contrainy:

Links:

  • Claude had some nice links and responses here: https://claude.ai/share/38b5424b-b803-46f9-b461-e98d129a8b13